Two relevant aspects of this period's unprecedented statutory activity must be noted. First, new statutes provided for the creation of new institutions of administration and adjudication, such as the Court of Wards. Second, new statutory provisions called for authoritative interpretations by the profession. The method of legal education in the inns of court concerning the manner in which readings on statutes were conducted changed accordingly. Readings became the individual products of the particular reader and often addressed recent case interpretations of statutory provisions. This article addresses one example of this second change which can best be understood after considering the general nature of the Court of Wards and the readings.
The Statute of Wills of 1540 created a tax loophole for transfers of property to illegitimate children. Assessments for wardships that would normally be imposed on certain transfers of land to children could be effectively avoided by establishing that the donee was illegitimate, and therefore a stranger to the donor for the purposes of the statute. English lawyers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries educated their colleagues about this newly available loophole. In the inns of court, lawyers discussed the statutory provisions and recent revenue cases from the Court of Wards. This article sets out the loophole, examines how the statute created a favorable tax situation for illegitimate children of the donor, and demonstrates how the inns and the courts grappled with interpreting ambiguous statutory language.
M C. Mirow,
Bastardy and the Statute of Wills: Interpreting a Sixteenth-Century Statute with Cases and Readings
, 69 Miss. L.J. 345
Available at: http://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/122