Abstract
To this point, we have developed some idea of what progress might have meant to the constitutional Framers, ratifiers, and later judges. We need not attempt the fruitless task of doing any precise head count of the variations of the concrete meaning, perceived likelihood, or value of progress among those parties. Doubtless some persons were more optimistic than others.178 But we need only assume that enough constitutional Framers, ratifiers, and judicial interpreters sufficiently shared any mainstream understanding of progress. Any such constitutional legitimacy of the idea, or the multiple ideas, of progress licenses the language of progress embraced in Trop.
Recommended Citation
R. George Wright, Cruel and Unusual Punishments and the Constitutional Status of the Idea of Progress, 20 FIU L. Rev. 1061 (2026), https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.20.3.11.
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Society Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons
